The question “what makes effective language
teaching” is so difficult to answer because language learners and teachers
alike all have different personalities, preferences and learning styles. Some
language learners may find that the Total Physical Response method to be most
effective for them, while others may feel that the Total Physical Response
method did not help them at all, but they really learned a lot with the Grammar-Translation
method. As we saw in the reading, there are many
different methods of foreign language teaching, all with their own advantages
and drawbacks. I think effective foreign language teachers should take all of these methods into account in
order to create the sort of hybrid teaching method that they feel works best
for their students and for themselves.
While reading chapter three, I came across
several aspects of the different teaching methods that I personally found to be
very important and effective; these would be the different aspects that I would
combine into my hybrid teaching method. First, from the Audiolingual Method, I
think it is very effective (if age appropriate) for the native language to be
almost completely banned from the classroom. Obviously if you have a class of
kindergarteners you will probably speak a little English and allow your
students to do so as well, but for the most part, I think the target language
should be spoken about 95% of the time in any class above a low-novice level. I
think the ideas that students should not
be given time to think about their answers and that grammar discussions should
be very brief are also very effective because, although this may sound
backwards, I think implementing those practices can actually give students more
confidence. I feel that by not
discussing many grammar rules and by not making
speaking seem like such a big deal, students will come to lose their anxiety
about speaking in the target language during class. Of course I would never
force any student to speak if they really did not feel comfortable doing so,
but I think sometimes producing the language yourself through speaking is built
up to be such a big, scary thing while really the only way to get better at it
is to practice, and once you start practicing more and more, you start to
become more used to the feeling.
I also think this idea works very nicely with
the ideas of the Total Physical Response teaching method which emphasizes
listening and understanding the target language and producing a complete
physical response with your body. The elementary school Spanish teacher that I
observed for my Education 500 class used the Total Physical Response method
with her students, and I only saw good results from it. Although the first
through fifth graders that she taught were not speaking much in Spanish, they
were all producing complete physical responses which indicated to us that they
were understanding the Spanish we were saying to them. If we told the students
(in Spanish) to “color the picture of the duck yellow and then put it on your
heads,” all of the students, without talking to each other, would follow the
directions perfectly. I think that the Total Physical Response method is very
effective for lower level language classes, and for students of any level that
do not feel very comfortable with speaking because while it emphasizes
listening and comprehension, it does not require the students to produce much of the target language on
their own.
I think recording your own voice speaking in
the target language is very effective for pronunciation (from the Community
Language Learning method) and I think the idea of periodically using
breathing/relaxation techniques could also be very effective in helping the
students think about and internalize new information (from the Suggestopedia
method). Like I said before, I think that all of the different teaching methods
have their own advantages and disadvantages, and all language learners and
teachers will find different aspects of these methods to be effective or not,
depending on their own personalities, preferences, and learning styles. I think
it’s very important that language teachers don’t feel that they have to choose one teaching method and
stick to it; the teacher can take the aspects of each method that they feel are
most effective and use them in their classroom when and how they see fit.
I agree that TPR can be useful, especially for younger students (your EDUC 500 example). I do question, however, the validity of it being used with students at a higher age level, for example high school or even college. I think that the level of picking up language in elementary school is much different than that of high school because at this point, students are still learning rules of their L1.
ReplyDeleteI saw the same results with Total Physical Response in my own Education 500 experience and I agree with you that it's a great method for younger students who are first learning the language. Our own parents exaggerate movements or point to things when we are first learning our native language, right? Employing the same methods in a beginning foreign language class so that the students not only see the actions that provide a meaning for the verb but they instantly comprehend what the word means as well
ReplyDeleteRecording your own voice speaking the target language is such a weird concept but it is so effective! I remember when I took John Chaston's phonetics class, he made us record ourselves reading poems at the beginning of the year (before we had significant information about how Spanish phonetics worked). I thought it was so strange when I first did it, then when I listened to my recording at the end of the semester, I was shocked at how much I had learned. Sometimes these kinds of teaching methods are overlooked but it is important to bring these reflective activities back into the classroom, it worked for me!
ReplyDelete